The Reality Method 2.0

How to succeed with women, actually, for real…and for free.
March 24th, 2008

How We Trick Ourselves Into Not Approaching Women

Some motherfuckers are always tryin’ to ice skate uphill.
-Wesley Snipes, Blade

There has been much discussion on this site, and those like it, of approach anxiety.

In fact, there may be more ink spilled on this one topic than any other single topic in the whole canon of seduction literature. I have a whole host of articles that deal with it on this very site (from How to Talk to Complete Strangers Without Anxiety, to Why You Should Sarge, and all the way through to Art of Conversation: Opening, a perfect companion piece for the Top 100 Universal Conversation Openers).

One might imagine that we write about approach anxiety so much because it’s so damnably common. (Without the weight of any statistically-significant randomized survey data to back me up, I would guess that anecdotally, approach anxiety affects approximately 5 out of 5 would-be seducers).

One might also imagine that fear of approaching beautiful women is a constant, something that we all must battle through and deal with, and therefore perhaps a measure of our seduction chops — do we go out and do cold approaches? Are we man enough?

One might imagine this, but one would be wrong.

It’s become clear to me over the past several months that what we call “approach anxiety”, i.e. that flutter of fear we feel in our stomachs, that rising tide of anxiety that blocks our throats when we go to talk to a beautiful woman, is actually not necessary.

It’s a trick.

It’s a false fear.

We don’t actually need to face it. We certainly don’t need to do battle with it.

Since this concept is an anathema to conventional seduction literature, I’ll spend the next few paragraphs explaining how our brains trick us into being afraid of approaching women….and how you can re-program your brain and your behaviors to never feel approach anxiety again.

Test Case #1: Approach Anxiety Analyzed
Let’s look at how Approach Anxiety most typically manifests itself. We’ll start with our test case, Casey.

Casey has read a lot of seduction material over the past 6 months, and is just now forcing himself to go out to bars and clubs on Friday and Saturday nights, in hopes of meeting and picking up a hot woman. His goal isn’t really to become a master pickup artist, at least not yet — he’d be happy getting his first same-night lay.

So Casey decides to go out to his nearest local martini bar, Venue. He pumps himself up while showering, shaving and splashing himself with cologne, listening to his favorite heavy metal or nu-trance band — but it takes him some time to get downtown, and by the time he reaches the front door and is waiting in line, his pulse has quickened notably. Will he score tonight? Will the hot chicks talk to him? Will his material work?

He walks in, trying to look aloof and “cool”. He confidently walks to the bar and, trying to calm himself, orders a dirty martini, shaken not stirred. He looks around the room and almost immediately spots a gorgeous 10. She is about 5′6, 110 lbs, is wearing a slinky black dress that accentuates her enormous bosom and a perfect angelic face. She is chatting with a 6′1 musclebound young man.

Casey imagines walking over and interrupting her conversation to introduce himself. His palms are instantly sweaty.

What should he say? He should try the “who lies more” opener. No, no, that’s too tired and cliche. He should use the “badass little kid” story. No, that’s a piece of attraction material, not an opener. He needs a good opener. What’s the best opener to use? Wait, there’s a bad-ass looking guy talking to her, maybe he needs to start AMOGing that guy right away.

Casey’s heart is racing.

In his mind’s eye, he is picturing the long, slow walk across the room, dodging other patrons, cocktailers, and a busy busboy. He can’t decide if it would be better if SlinkyBlackDress looked over and saw him approaching, or if neither of them noticed him until he was ready to pounce. He is picturing himself delivering an opening line. He is picturing himself flubbing the delivery, stammering, sounding nervous, and the hard gaze of SlinkyDress and her RippedMaleFriend as they both turn to him, the Outsider, the Invader, rudely Butting Into Their Conversation.

He imagines himself getting bodily thrown out of Venue by the other male.

He envisions a drink thrown in his face.

He envisions the snickers and politely-averted gazes of other bar patrons.

His mind rapidly and categorically flips through all sorts of nightmare scenarios.

Because he is not in control of his mind, his emotional state is now fluctuating wildly, and he is telegraphing his insecurity and anxiety to everyone around him. Although he may have had a chance of chatting up SlinkyBlackDress, he is now such an insecure wreck that any approach attempt is almost guaranteed to fall flat.

He chugs his drink to suppress his anxiety, and orders another one.

Four hours and $40 lighter, and having not spoken to a single woman, Casey staggers home, trying to imagine the value in his having gone out that night. He danced with some chicks on the dance floor, and some of them even touched him. He got more comfortable being in nightclubs. All in all, a success, he tries to tell himself, except for one glaring feature, one that he cannot rationalize away: he didn’t approach.

Angry and despondent and drunk, Casey comes home and logs onto internet chat-boards, his virtual solace of pimpitude. He fires off a new post to his favorite forums: Why can’t I conquer my approach anxiety?

Frustrated, our hero Casey jacks off to pictures of Maria Sharpova and goes to sleep.

The next morning, his PUA query has been answered by a handful of gurus: some suggest not drinking. Others suggest inner-game tapping. Still others suggest he “just do it”. None of the advice seems particularly helpful; but Casey is happy to know he’s not alone, and that approach anxiety seems to affect everyone.

Does that sound like a story you’ve heard before?

Let me tell you a different one.

Test Case #2: Approach Anxiety Banished
Let’s look at our second subject, Daniel.

Daniel doesn’t know anything about the seduction industry. He does know that he likes women and getting laid.

After breaking up with his girlfriend of 8 months, Daniel realizes it’s time to go back “on the prowl”. He’s never had very long relationships, but has always had a vague idea of how to put himself out there with women, mostly gathered by stumbling through clumsy telegraphing of attraction in high school, middle school, grade school, kindergarten, and preschool. In other words, Daniel knows, fundamentally but dimly and on some subconscious level, that he is attractive to women — but he is not terribly deliberate about trying to “create” attraction. Having grown up in a rural area, Daniel is more accustomed to bucking hay than spitting game.

Daniel is new the city, and not sure where to find the hottest women. He doesn’t read Style or GQ or Maxim, so he doesn’t know how to “pimp himself out” like most men in his city do. He goes out for some beers with a few buddies on a Friday night at a local sports tavern, but, searching for something more, parts company with them after a few beers, and stumbles across a dark martini bar. He enters, and stops just inside the doorway — it is very dark inside, and he gives his eyes time to adjust.

As his eyes adjust, he lets them wander across the gathered patrons, automatically scanning for beautiful faces. He spots one gorgeous girl standing at the bar, apparently by herself. She happens to be looking his way, and they lock eyes for a moment. When she breaks eye contact demurely, he walks over to her, positioning himself a few feet away from her. He orders a bottled beer and looks over at her again. She looks back at him, and smiles. He says “Hi”.

A half hour later, neither of them feel Casey’s nervous eyes flitting over them, because they are locked deeply in intimate conversation.

Two hours later, Daniel and the girl are making out in front of her house. Two minutes later, she is inviting him up for a nightcap. And he never felt even the slightest approach anxiety.

The Cold Approach is Dead. . . Long Live the Cold Approach
Contrived examples? Deliberately contrived, in order to prove my point:

What we IMAGINE as “approaching” is not how “approaching” actually happens, in the vast majority of circumstances in which men and women hook up.

In other words, approach anxiety is a condition generated by our misidentification of what it is we have to do in order to get women in bed with us.

The cold approach, defined as being walking up to a woman we don’t know and starting to talk to her, is rapidly becoming a dead technique. Even though it was championed by several successive waves of pick up arists, it was never, and is still not, a practice that will generate a high percentage of successful closes.

This is because the cold approach generates anxiety for everyone involved. It causes anxiety to you, because your mind is evolutionary programmed to fear rejection, and to warn you of that danger over and over again as you struggle to put one foot in front of another on your way over to her. This anxiety can’t help but bleed out of your body language and general vibe, and women will pick up on this, and mistake it for anxiety about your value as a potential partner, setting up a drain on their potential attraction to you from the get-go.

Cold approaching also generates emotional flux for women, and typically not good emotional flux, because they are put under pressure to respond and handle any number of totally inane, inappropriate, vaguely threatening, or embarrassing things you could say. From the perspective of a woman you’ve approached cold, the subset of things you could say that would actually feel emotionally OK for her to hear from a complete stranger is much, much smaller than the set of things you are likely to say that will make her feel some sort of bad emotion. And this is from her experience being approached by inane and unskilled guys all her life, getting cat-called, “holla”‘d at, etcetera.)

Think about it like this: if a cold approach (i.e., walking straight up to a girl whose never seen you before in her life and hitting her with an opener) is successful at a default rate of 50% of the time (a generous offer — and modified of course by your skill with delivery, body language, your general attractiveness, the venue, the lighting, the music levels, the girls’ mood, her sobriety level and time of the month, and a whole host of other factors), you will have to open 10 girls to get 5 numbers.

If, on the other hand, you use another technique (not a cold approach) that is successful at a default rate of 75% of the time (which technique I will explain momentarily), you will only have to open ~7 women to get the same 5 numbers.

At root, it’s a question of time and effort. How much time and energy do you want to spend spinning your wheels, as opposed to staying in good interactions?

Change your Behaviors, Change your Results
I’m not saying cold approaches are totally ineffectual (obviously, they’re not). My argument is that they are one of the lowest-probability methods you can use to meet women.

Cold approaches run contrary to the natural path of attraction. Attraction’s natural path begins with awareness and continues through contact to closure. The recommended path of the Pick Up Artist is to put contact BEFORE awareness. There is no reason for cold approaches to exist at all. Except, perhaps, as an arbitrary method by which guys who are otherwise not very confident could gain confidence through repeated exposure to a difficult task (as in, “I used to be paralyzed by shyness, but I did 100 cold approaches in a row and conquered my fear.”)

But what about the seducer’s creed? “I can pick up any beautiful woman, any time, anywhere?” Doesn’t that neccessitate a cold approach? What if you see the most beautiful woman in your city walking away from you down the street? Wouldn’t you have to approach her cold?

Well, yes — if the above creed was your goal. My question is, why on earth would that be your goal? As goals go, it sucks — not only is it not specific, it’s wholly unachievable. There is no man on earth who can pick up any beautiful woman in any situation, simply because we as humans can only control a very few factors in our environment, and in order to fulfill the above creed you’d need to be able to control them all. And no pick up artist can do that.

“Okay, 30,” I hear you saying, “This is all very well and good. But what are the practical take-aways from this article?”

Here they are:

  1. Start making eye contact with beautiful woman everywhere.
  2. When you’ve held eye contact with a woman for more than 5 seconds, OR had repeated instances of eye contact of at least a few seconds each, you are cleared to approach. This is now a warm approach.
  3. Don’t walk straight up to the woman in question. Rather, position yourself closer to her, with open posture and attitude.
  4. Look over and smile. If she reciprocates, start speaking. This is the warmest approach you will get (and in many cases, she will start speaking before you get a chance to).

Finally, resolve to greatly reduce the number of times you execute the “attraction ambush” — approaching women from behind, breaking into conversations, or otherwise opening a conversation without some clear awareness and/or attraction signals. With this step alone, you will greatly improve your success, both in terms of subjective feelings of acceptance and attraction by women, and in terms of the objective reality of the number of good interactions you will get into.

Follow those four steps, and I can guarantee you that the quality of your results will begin to change immediately.

11 Responses to “How We Trick Ourselves Into Not Approaching Women”

  1. Tight post. I think many of us really do justify not approaching with this worst case scenario bulls**t.

  2. Maria Sharapova, thanks for the reminder. I need to look her up today!

    I enjoyed this post immensely. I never thought about it before, but you are right: cold approaches put the cart before the horse don’t they? Your breakdown of the path of attraction reminds me of the AIDA acronym. Attention, Interests, Decision/Desire and Action.

    I’ve noticed positive results with individuals who are aware of me before I talk to them vs the coldest of approaches, and I didn’t realize the difference until this moment.

    On a side note, I love your site. You have lengthy posts, but unlike some you stay on target. All of your information is vital and I never get lost while reading it.

  3. I like this post because it illustrates exactly the difference between the way the aspiring PUA and the natural think - and those differences can’t help but manifest themselves in the many subtle behaviors of the interaction, if it even gets that far.

    Because Casey approaches the the process of going out with a heavy emotional charge (”I’m going to go get chicks tonight to prove that I am a male of sexual reproductive value”) he can’t help but be anxious about approaching. That’s a lot of pressure.

    Daniel doesn’t think about any of that. He follows his biological drive which manifests itself in a natural social impulse to position himself nearer to the girl and make eye contact.

    Though the specific case here is approach anxiety, what sets Daniel apart from Casey goes all the way back to inner game and outcome independence.

  4. Casey gets much better. He now has 50% success rate with his cold approach, and stopped caring about outcome.

    Daniel has 75% with his warm approach.

    They both walk on a busy street for an hour. Daniel gets eye contact from 40% of the women who pass him by (SERIOUSLY popular guy, eh?). He approaches all of them. He has a sexual opportunity with 30% of the street.

    Casey cold approaches everyone. He has a sexual opportunity with 50% of the street.

    A bit exaggerated, but the cold approach has served me well. By your stats, it’s the better option.

    Here in San Francisco, you’re lucky to get eye contact from ANYONE on the street, by the way. At a bar, never in my wildest dreams would I expect over 80% eye contact rate (which would be required to beat the 50% cold approach figure).

    Now, 50% seems a bit high, but I focus on stopping women on the street (something more like 15-25% converts into a d2). I’m just working with your stats ;)

  5. thirtyplus Says:
    April 2nd, 2008 at 1:59 am

    pzerp,

    Thanks for the thoughtful comment.

    You’re right that my figures were pretty arbitrary, but your point is well taken.

    Speaking of SFO, I will be testing both warm and cold approaches when I am there this weekend :) Watch this space for a report of what my actual #’s are like.

  6. thirtyplus Says:
    April 9th, 2008 at 4:45 am

    RESULTS FROM SAN FRAN:

    - I found my eye contact was good at about 50% on the street during the day. This means that, if I saw a woman I wanted to make eye contact with, and she was approaching me from between 10 and 25 feet away, I was able to get eye contact about 50% of the time. Sometimes brief, but still solid EC. In one case I had a girl staring at me as I passed and (mutual) staring, head fully turned over her shoulder as she walked away.

    - Night game: I was opened by 4 sets and proximity-opened by 1. Warm sets opened at 100%. Cold sets opened at about 50%.

    - I was bought drinks by 2 different sets.

    Maybe this was just down to the night I was out, the bar I was at, or something in the water, but overall, SF treated me very well. Eye contact in the bar/clubs was as good as the street - in fact - it seemed a bit better (maybe 65% max). This was contrary to my home city, where women on the street most often either give you a staredown look, or a shifty ultra-scared darting back and forth glance.

    NOTE ABOUT METRICS: I usually hate collecting “stats” or “numbers” related to games (for many reasons, but chiefly because they miss the whole point and reduce complex human interactions to meaningless bits of data). However, in this case, I felt that doing so was relevant to the discussion and article that prompted it, and in that context would add to the discussion rather than reduce it.

  7. Eric…

    To all the uninitiated out there - read this and take heed. This is good stuff. Thanks….

  8. I think this is true and I suppose its usefulness depends on what your goals are like 30 said. If for some reason you feel you want to completely destroy approach anxiety for personal growth reasons then don’t go this route cuz its so much easier. If a woman is sharing eye contact with you she will actually try to make the interaction flow when you go and talk to her, as opposed to feeling awkward and making you work to keep the interaction moving along. Just the other night I was at the bar and I noticed this girl there who was glancing over to me, and after her group of friends had left and opening I went and talked to her. As I started walking towards her she started to smile and then hugged, me a total stranger, but we were all ready “warm” so she felt safe enough to to this. We’re gonna hang out tomorrow. Other girls I talked to who I didn’t get any eye contact from we’re rude but I couldn’t get any kind of connection going. Why make things harder?

    I really felt that this blog entry helped me, cuz unlike Daniel I never felt really attractive to women, so if they were lookin at me, part of me would think it was just because i was lookin at them and they were looking at me like “what are u lookin at?.” So thanks for clearing that up.

  9. 30, in no way do i intend to put you on the spot or be negative. I’m not a ‘nonbeliever’ (in fact, im one of the most prolific posters on the san francisco lair, and have quite a real-life following from people who have seen me in person, and seen me operate).

    I have very very rarely been able to get eye contact from women on the street here, and I focus almost exclusively on it. I’m tall, decent looking, and dress in all sorts of crazy ways to get the attention (and sometimes normally). I believe you, though, and would love to find what factors you believe give you that rate. Obviously doing this over text, and not knowing eachother will make it close to trivial, but perhaps take this as a suggestion for a future article.

    Can I ask what day and clubs you attended?

    For night game in SF, areas around the marina are brutal. I’ve been opened at Matrix a few times, but it’s not often. Areas around Velencia will be much more kind to you. Still, it’s rare.

    The two things I’m most interested in;
    -What do you believe causes someone to get eye contact, and what causes them not to. (I have always assumed it was a SF thing. I can get eye contact in other places just fine. It may have to do with fashion choices.)
    -What you do and who you enter a nightclub with. Are you entering with women? Smiling big when you walk in? Are you with a large group? Alone? Etc. The basic MO would be interesting. Some people (like myself) rush in with a few friends and instantly go chasing the women. Others enter with a large group of friends, create a home base, and slowly branch out. The former tends to get opened more often, if the people they are with are not “value scanning” the room.

    I don’t mean to sound combative in any way, if I do, I apologize. Your writing is what got me into the whole scene, and now I’m having great success, have my own readers, and people who have learned from me. We both have stylistic differences, I’m certain, but once again, I mean absolutely no disrespect by this post. I literally credit a huge life change partially to you.

    -Pzerp

  10. thirtyplus Says:
    April 19th, 2008 at 7:48 am

    Hey pzerp,

    I am humbled by what you’ve written. Thanks for letting me know. I really didn’t consider that my blog could have had such an impact on anyone.

    Let me address the SF question.

    - I hit Beauty Bar on Mission on a Friday night I believe. Saturday night I spent at Bourbon and Branch and some other bars (Lush?) around Geary and Jones and had less success with opening and so-so eye contact. I also hit those scenes much later in the evening and wasn’t as intentional about what I was doing.

    - The Marina turned me off, I didn’t go into a single bar up there, not my scene and I didn’t want to mix with the types there. I would not try to socialize with those folks because I know it would be more or less futile.

    - What makes someone get eye contact is a topic for more in-depth exploration in another article but the short of it is: intention.

    - For all of my SF trip, I went into clubs and bars alone, and unsmiling. Headed straight to the bar, bought a drink, basically sat by myself like a bump on a log. I imagine my results would be much better if I entered with a group of my best friends, smiling, laughing, etc. Or maybe not.

    Now a question for you my friend:

    - What other places do you get eye contact in more frequently than SF?

    You’re right that discussing this via blog comments is a little silly. We should discuss (or rather, simply do) over some drinks when I’m in SF next, which, based on how much fun I had last time, will be sometime in the next 6 months.

  11. 30,
    I haven’t been to the beauty bar, but most mission areas are like velencia– friendly, down to earth chicks. Around geary and jones tends to be a bit more touristy, so it’s easier to pull same night lays, but requires a bit of a thick skin. The marina has much hotter women than the mission, but dealing with the attitude there is an art in and of itself. It can be done. My favorite opener there: “hey, you’re not those typical ‘marina chicks’ are you?”

    Like I said, I’m really not a nightgame guy, so I prefer to hit up the crowds on the street downtown, or near union square. Moving women on the street downtown give shit for eye contact. I have noticed better results at the less dense areas, but then the problem becomes the scarcity.

    I think that’s the answer to what’s going on. I always visit the most crowded places that I can find. If nightgaming, I stick to areas like marina or velencia… I literally leave places that aren’t packed enough.

    On the street, I generally stick to union square and downtown, where the crowds are huge.
    +there are coffee shops all over to bring her to, or you can have her help you shop at the mall.
    +if you get a blowout, walkaway, or whatever, there’s always another hottie behind you.
    -they think you’re selling something
    -they’re in a hurry

    If I do something like safeway or a bookstore, they’re generally focused on other things. Obviously attempting to get eye contact at safeway while she’s trying to remember her grocery list isn’t optimal.

    If I’m hitting a park or something, I’ll bet eye contact would be easier. I generally seek out higher population areas, this is probably why you and I see such a huge difference in eye contact and warm approaches.

    Additionally, when I’m in smaller towns, a white motorcycle jacket and coloured hair is enough to get me all of the eye contact in the world. In SF, this doesn’t stand out. To stand out in SF would be competing with the guys covered in gold paint making tips on the sidewalk. On the other hand, my friend wore a gigantic fake gold chain, and got opened like crazy. I saw a “thug” guy wearing the same chain one day, and he was being ignored. My friend is ex-military, so the chain looks *very* comical and out of place. Fashion choices have something to do with it, as much as I’m not a fan of fuzzy hats and whatnot.

    Low key events like coffee shops are easy as hell. Areas like 111 minna is easy (it’s a daytime bar, sorta).

    So my takeaway, and a brief conclusion to be tested as soon as I can (I was in a motorcycle accident and can’t leave my house for a while);
    -I strongly suspect it has to do with crowd density and the venue. I’ll hit up less crowded areas and keep this on my mind, and report back with the results. Unfortunately I have to wait 45 days :(

    When you come back to SF, get ahold of me. You have my email (i changed it from the last one I was using; I check this one more often).

Leave a Reply