<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hot Babe Scale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realitymethod.com/2007/02/the-hot-babe-scale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realitymethod.com/2007/02/the-hot-babe-scale/</link>
	<description>How to succeed with women, actually, for real...and for free.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: my wife is selling a camera on eBay, giving you guys the option to buy it first... - Page 2 - eBay Suspension Forum - eBay and Paypal Talk</title>
		<link>http://realitymethod.com/2007/02/the-hot-babe-scale/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>my wife is selling a camera on eBay, giving you guys the option to buy it first... - Page 2 - eBay Suspension Forum - eBay and Paypal Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realitymethod.com/?p=85#comment-560</guid>
		<description>[...] she's average, possibly HB5.. Learn to give props only to women that deserve it, i.e. hot women.. The Hot Babe Scale &#124; The Reality Method  As a quality men, we don't date women that 6 and bellow, and some have their bar set at 7, 8 and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] she&#8217;s average, possibly HB5.. Learn to give props only to women that deserve it, i.e. hot women.. The Hot Babe Scale | The Reality Method  As a quality men, we don&#8217;t date women that 6 and bellow, and some have their bar set at 7, 8 and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://realitymethod.com/2007/02/the-hot-babe-scale/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realitymethod.com/?p=85#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Using a scale to rate women's attractiveness will always be subjective in the finer detail of calibration but I'm sure we can agree the differences between a 1 and a 10, everything else in between is arguable.

Though it's great to see that there is freedom here for women to post their disagreements .... it is a blog for men talking about women... and... 

As men, we are initially attracted to women from our reptilian brain.. ie Physical Appearances.

If that upsets women.. too bad they don't bother to understand men even a little better. Don't let a woman put you down for being a man, and don't be scared to be one.

That's just the initial attraction phase for men.

As a man matures that attraction will always be there, it becomes tempered with more insight and from past experiences to include a higher understanding of emotional intelligence.

I know for me these days if I'm sexually attracted to a woman, cause let's face it, that's what we are really talking about... if I feel uncomfortable about waking up next to her... I won't go there.

What I find interesting is, after my initial (blink) attraction, the more time I spend with a woman, the less attractive she starts to appear... physically... but if she has a personality I click with, she becomes more attractive in a different way.

So in my scale, I might see she is a 7 physically (looks), has a 10 personality, has a chemical attraction of 10 (smell, taste, touch)

Not that I actually will rate a woman like that, it's just a feeling or sense of her I gradually get.

I've met some women who were smoking hot to look at... but I wasn't attracted to her chemically. I've met women who I considered, ordinary looking, almost flat chested, short (under 5') but I had this amazing chemical attraction for.

Anyway, I guess that's why it's called The Human Complex.
and why and how evolution works so well. We are not all attracted to the same people for the same reasons...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a scale to rate women&#8217;s attractiveness will always be subjective in the finer detail of calibration but I&#8217;m sure we can agree the differences between a 1 and a 10, everything else in between is arguable.</p>
<p>Though it&#8217;s great to see that there is freedom here for women to post their disagreements &#8230;. it is a blog for men talking about women&#8230; and&#8230; </p>
<p>As men, we are initially attracted to women from our reptilian brain.. ie Physical Appearances.</p>
<p>If that upsets women.. too bad they don&#8217;t bother to understand men even a little better. Don&#8217;t let a woman put you down for being a man, and don&#8217;t be scared to be one.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just the initial attraction phase for men.</p>
<p>As a man matures that attraction will always be there, it becomes tempered with more insight and from past experiences to include a higher understanding of emotional intelligence.</p>
<p>I know for me these days if I&#8217;m sexually attracted to a woman, cause let&#8217;s face it, that&#8217;s what we are really talking about&#8230; if I feel uncomfortable about waking up next to her&#8230; I won&#8217;t go there.</p>
<p>What I find interesting is, after my initial (blink) attraction, the more time I spend with a woman, the less attractive she starts to appear&#8230; physically&#8230; but if she has a personality I click with, she becomes more attractive in a different way.</p>
<p>So in my scale, I might see she is a 7 physically (looks), has a 10 personality, has a chemical attraction of 10 (smell, taste, touch)</p>
<p>Not that I actually will rate a woman like that, it&#8217;s just a feeling or sense of her I gradually get.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve met some women who were smoking hot to look at&#8230; but I wasn&#8217;t attracted to her chemically. I&#8217;ve met women who I considered, ordinary looking, almost flat chested, short (under 5&#8242;) but I had this amazing chemical attraction for.</p>
<p>Anyway, I guess that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s called The Human Complex.<br />
and why and how evolution works so well. We are not all attracted to the same people for the same reasons&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://realitymethod.com/2007/02/the-hot-babe-scale/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realitymethod.com/?p=85#comment-253</guid>
		<description>I employ three scales:

1) watchability(1-10): looks alone, as above. (and I'm afraid I don't calibrate well to 30+ scale- sorry bro! :) Good when hanging at the beach, etc..

2) fuckability (1-20): looks + personality. I am at the point in life where if a girl is a box of rox or a sack of weasels in between the ears, I won't bother to pursue, no matter the "hotness" based on looks. As you've noted elsewhere, good sex is as much a mental as physical thing.

3) livability (1-30): looks + personality + character. Relationship evaluation. This brings in factors that make her a good partner/companion outside the sack (reliabilty, honesty,shared beliefs, etc.) This kicks in once we've Done The Deed a few times, at least.

Note that most women (and intelligent men) use my latter two scales at least subconsciously). I find that this puts me in good calibration with most women on many levels.

I guess the Tantric folks would add a couple more axes, based on Chakras, etc., but three is plenty for my unevolved mind to handle ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I employ three scales:</p>
<p>1) watchability(1-10): looks alone, as above. (and I&#8217;m afraid I don&#8217;t calibrate well to 30+ scale- sorry bro! :) Good when hanging at the beach, etc..</p>
<p>2) fuckability (1-20): looks + personality. I am at the point in life where if a girl is a box of rox or a sack of weasels in between the ears, I won&#8217;t bother to pursue, no matter the &#8220;hotness&#8221; based on looks. As you&#8217;ve noted elsewhere, good sex is as much a mental as physical thing.</p>
<p>3) livability (1-30): looks + personality + character. Relationship evaluation. This brings in factors that make her a good partner/companion outside the sack (reliabilty, honesty,shared beliefs, etc.) This kicks in once we&#8217;ve Done The Deed a few times, at least.</p>
<p>Note that most women (and intelligent men) use my latter two scales at least subconsciously). I find that this puts me in good calibration with most women on many levels.</p>
<p>I guess the Tantric folks would add a couple more axes, based on Chakras, etc., but three is plenty for my unevolved mind to handle ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dork</title>
		<link>http://realitymethod.com/2007/02/the-hot-babe-scale/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Dork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realitymethod.com/?p=85#comment-252</guid>
		<description>You did a good job with this, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did a good job with this, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirtyplus</title>
		<link>http://realitymethod.com/2007/02/the-hot-babe-scale/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>thirtyplus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realitymethod.com/?p=85#comment-242</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62; Is it a pretty face? Awesome body? Nice tits? Intelligent?

Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Is it a pretty face? Awesome body? Nice tits? Intelligent?</p>
<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://realitymethod.com/2007/02/the-hot-babe-scale/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realitymethod.com/?p=85#comment-251</guid>
		<description>As a woman, I have always been curious about how men view the attractiveness scale and I can see that it is highly subjective.  But only to an extent.  When I was in jr. high I had short hair and braces and was called ugly.  From the time I was a sophmore, I was told by men and women that I am pretty or beautiful.  I never believed them and still don't to this day.  I am married now, but I can never get over being called ugly during that phase in my life so I seek validation of my looks.  According to hotornot.com, I am an 8.  But honestly, most of the reason for that is probably due to the fact that I have DDs.  When I used to go to clubs, I got hit on a fair amount but not often because the people I used to hang out with were predominantly male so I was always surrounded by men.  However, I was constanly being hit on by the men in our entourage even though most of them were friends with my husband.  I know this is rambling, but I am really curious what exactly men find most attractive about a woman.  Is it a pretty face?  Awesome body?  Nice tits?  Intelligent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a woman, I have always been curious about how men view the attractiveness scale and I can see that it is highly subjective.  But only to an extent.  When I was in jr. high I had short hair and braces and was called ugly.  From the time I was a sophmore, I was told by men and women that I am pretty or beautiful.  I never believed them and still don&#8217;t to this day.  I am married now, but I can never get over being called ugly during that phase in my life so I seek validation of my looks.  According to hotornot.com, I am an 8.  But honestly, most of the reason for that is probably due to the fact that I have DDs.  When I used to go to clubs, I got hit on a fair amount but not often because the people I used to hang out with were predominantly male so I was always surrounded by men.  However, I was constanly being hit on by the men in our entourage even though most of them were friends with my husband.  I know this is rambling, but I am really curious what exactly men find most attractive about a woman.  Is it a pretty face?  Awesome body?  Nice tits?  Intelligent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cherry</title>
		<link>http://realitymethod.com/2007/02/the-hot-babe-scale/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>cherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realitymethod.com/?p=85#comment-249</guid>
		<description>I'm a lady attracted to both sexes, so I do like to judge the looks of women.

Don't get me wrong, Barbie is sexy, but there are so many different kinds of sexy out there besides the tiny elf nose and very square jaw.  Aside from the 10th, your examples keep getting blonder and more elf-like as the scale rises.

I'm not completely protesting your Hot Babe scale.  The bit about the attitude of the chick IS very important.  You can assess whether she is overly-proud after speaking with her for a short while.  It's not fun to be with any chick that is overly proud.  Even if she is a 10 it's a turn off to see her (or anyone) acting so self-obsessed.

Some of the examples are somewhat confusing though.  For example, do you value the balloon implants look over the perky-but-natural look?  The picture of the 8.0 is the most confusing due to her augmentations. But I do have to say, you are SO right about Janet Reno. :D

Overall, I find that the sexiest ladies are the ones that radiate with health - they're obviously in shape, with flawless glowing skin, their hair has lots of shine, their eyes are clear and bright, their features are close to symmetrical, and of course they must have nice T&#38;A.  Lots of other factors also come into it though - posture, gait, and the attention that these ladies give to their hygiene and personal style - these things also influence a lady's physical appearance in a big way.



&#60;3 cherry
rated 8.8 on hotornot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a lady attracted to both sexes, so I do like to judge the looks of women.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, Barbie is sexy, but there are so many different kinds of sexy out there besides the tiny elf nose and very square jaw.  Aside from the 10th, your examples keep getting blonder and more elf-like as the scale rises.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not completely protesting your Hot Babe scale.  The bit about the attitude of the chick IS very important.  You can assess whether she is overly-proud after speaking with her for a short while.  It&#8217;s not fun to be with any chick that is overly proud.  Even if she is a 10 it&#8217;s a turn off to see her (or anyone) acting so self-obsessed.</p>
<p>Some of the examples are somewhat confusing though.  For example, do you value the balloon implants look over the perky-but-natural look?  The picture of the 8.0 is the most confusing due to her augmentations. But I do have to say, you are SO right about Janet Reno. :D</p>
<p>Overall, I find that the sexiest ladies are the ones that radiate with health - they&#8217;re obviously in shape, with flawless glowing skin, their hair has lots of shine, their eyes are clear and bright, their features are close to symmetrical, and of course they must have nice T&amp;A.  Lots of other factors also come into it though - posture, gait, and the attention that these ladies give to their hygiene and personal style - these things also influence a lady&#8217;s physical appearance in a big way.</p>
<p>&lt;3 cherry<br />
rated 8.8 on hotornot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
