I am with you on your last statement. We demand more in proportion to how much we have grown individually. There is another article here that I am working on, having to do with this phenomenon of how our own internal sense of “value” changes over time and what impact that has on the women we are both able and desirous of attracting.

I think the 1-10 scale has, historically, been just for looks. It’s pretty much a quick and dirty “on the street” guide. The more information you get about a woman, the less sense it makes to try to describe all that information with a single digit.

My question…

Was the 1-10 scale made up to classify the women we approach (sorry open) initial attraction.

Or a scale to classify women we already know?

As far as demanding more from women… touche’

Ever since women been given freedom to explore their own self independence and don’t necessarily need a man’s financial support. They have been demanding more and more from men.

Yet, they still unconsciously gauge a man’s worth by his ability to provide, it also seems to be changing now to be ‘his social worth’.

It seems that women still want to hang on to the idea that, they are the prize.

They still expect men to chase them. Though it’s obvious is some circumstances that that role can be reversed.

I’m finding the deeper I go into understanding and embodying a higher evolutionary state… ie growing as a man, there are less and less women I can relate to and feel attracted to in consideration of a longer relationship.